During my mother’s memorial in Mangochi, my aunt was distributing t-shirts at my grandmother’s house, when she fell and fractured both bones in her right leg. They rushed her to the hospital near my home [where my mom passed on], and I quickly rushed over to check on her.
Like most hospital visits, it turned into hours of waiting and conversation.
It was there, in that setting that a question about the economy began to take shape.
Two former Members of Parliament came up in conversation—both known in the area.
One is Victoria Kingstone, who had represented Mangochi Central under the Democratic Progressive Party.
The other is Roza Fatch Mbilizi, who would go on to win the same seat in the 2025 elections.
I have known both women over my life, and have the privilege of calling them both aunt, as they have been friends of my parents.
I asked how the result had turned.
The nurse seated next to me had her explanations:
Roza’s campaign symbol was a maize cob.
Victoria’s was a storage barn.
People saw the maize and voted.
People just want to eat.
There was no mention of manifestos. No reference to policy. No discussion of long-term plans.
At first glance, it reads like a failure of political judgment. It is not.
It is a precise reflection of the conditions under which economic and political decisions are being made.

Delve into Business and International Development with Nthanda Manduwi
We find ourselves at a uniquely consequential moment in human history.
According to the ITU, roughly 6 billion people are connected to the internet, compared tofewer than 400 million at the turn of the millennium. Three-quarters of humanity now participates in a shared digital environment where information can move across borders almost instantly.
However, more than 2 billion people remain offline. Only about 36% of Africa’s population is online, meaning roughly 64% is offline. This is the real crisis: Africa accounts for roughly 43–45% of all offline people on Earth.
The digital divide is what pushed me to pursue a Master of Science in Information Management Systems at theMalawi University of Science and Technology[research track], and specifically the entrepreneurial opportunities posited by Africa’s Digital Transformation.
In present day, artificial intelligence is diffusing through society at extraordinary speed. According to Microsoft, roughly one in six people worldwide now use generative AI tools, while nearly 80 percent of organizations report using AI in at least one business function. Global investment in AI has reached hundreds of billions of dollars annually. As I pursued my MBA at the Michigan State University, I got deeper into the question of what kind of tech we can build for those who are vastly marginalized.
Yet the technology itself is only part of the story.
The amount of compute used to train frontier AI systems has been growing at roughly five times per year since 2020, dramatically increasing humanity’s ability to generate, synthesize, and distribute knowledge. Questions that once required teams of researchers and years of analysis can increasingly be explored in hours, days, or minutes.
And yet, despite unprecedented access to information, the world’s defining challenges remain remarkably familiar: conflict, inequality, institutional distrust, climate change, corruption, political polarization, and uneven development.
As our tools become more powerful, a more difficult question emerges:
What happens when technological progress outpaces human progress?
What happens when societies gain access to better evidence but remain constrained by the same incentives, assumptions, identities, and systems that shaped previous generations?
That was the heart of my talk.
WORLD 2.0: Smarter Machines, Faster Evidence, Same Egos
On the 22nd of March, 2026, I and 8 other leaders took to the stage with TEDxMSU, and I delivered a talk on ‘Ego’.
TEDxMSU is a non-profit initiative led by students of Michigan State University. This year’s theme was Sonder, and it celebrated the realization that every person you encounter is living a life and carries stories as vivid and complex as your own.
This being my first TEDTalk, it was ideally a very brief synthesis of a broader body of work explored throughout the both the Lessons Books [publishing on the 6th of July, 2026] – a seven-part inquiry into international development as it is lived, practiced, and inherited, particularly from the vantage point of the Global South.
That book series is my 4 year commitment, to preface this here podcast: the Lessons Conversation.
From the first industrial revolution through imperialism, neocolonialism and development to artificial intelligence and global cooperation, I in this talk examine the tension between what we now know and what we are willing to do with that knowledge.
The audio in this substack and the video on YouTube are similar, yet starkly different. I explain why and how at the beginning of the podcast.
Listen wherever you get your Podcasts [Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, etc]
If you make time to listen to both, I’d love to hear from you what were the things I may have edited out, or just forgotten to say on stage. Feel free to email me your ideas, and stand a chance to win free copies of my upcoming books [if you get some things right!]
Thanks for listening to the Lessons Conversation! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Episode 8: Mastery [Coming Next Week]
10,000 Hours, and How Artificial Intelligence Can Get You There
In next week’s conversation, we get deeper into tech, as we explore artificial intelligence.
I am currently reading two books: Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick, and I Am Not a Robot by Joanna Stern. I had a sit down with the former Minister of Tourism in Malawi, Dr. Vera Kamtukule, to discuss the future of technology in Malawi, and beyond.
In that episode, we will dive deeper into how I personally use AI in my day to day life; how leaders like Ethan and Joanna use AI, and some best practices on how AI can help you advance in your personal work and explorations.
As always, keep asking:
What works?
In what context?
Under what circumstances?
and…
Why?
Enjoyed the listen? This post is public, so feel free to share it with your community.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit podcast.lessonsconversation.com

In Malawi’s 2025 general elections, voter turnout was approximately 76 percent, and Afrobarometer surveys show that over 80 percent of Malawians consistently report that they intend to vote. People participate. They queue. They show up. They care.
At the same time, they are voting in an environment defined by economic strain.
Recent reporting shows that inflation has remained above 20 percent for multiple consecutive years, and more than 70 percent of Malawians live below the international poverty line for low-income countries. Food insecurity is not peripheral—it is central. Afrobarometer data indicates that roughly 58 percent of Malawians identify food shortage as one of the most urgent issues government must address.
Under those conditions, political participation does not disappear. It adapts.
When people are operating under economic pressure, the structure of decision-making changes.
Choices are no longer anchored in long-term system performance. They are anchored in immediacy.
The maize cob is not symbolic in the abstract. It is materially relevant.
Voting for maize is not irrational. It is economically consistent with a system where survival is the dominant constraint.
Most public conversations about development begin with infrastructure.
The roads are poor.
Electricity is unreliable.
Water systems are inconsistent.
Internet access is limited.
The conclusion follows:
the government is not delivering.
There is a truth in this. These failures are real. They affect productivity, mobility, and quality of life. Governments are responsible for addressing them.
But the analysis often stops at the level of service delivery.
It assumes that fixing the economy begins with fixing infrastructure. It assumes that governments can generate these systems independently of the economic structure beneath them.
This is where the reasoning becomes incomplete.
An economy is not a set of policies. It is a structure of production.
People work.
Firms organize that work.
Goods and services are produced.
Value is exchanged.
From this process:
From those taxes:
The direction of causality matters.
Production precedes public investment.
If production is limited, everything that depends on it is constrained.
Malawi’s constraint is not effort. It is structure. The economy remains heavily concentrated in:
Industrial production is limited. Manufacturing capacity is narrow. A large share of economic activity does not generate high, stable, taxable income.
This becomes visible in labor market data.
Each year, approximately 270,000 young people enter Malawi’s labor force, while the formal sector generates only around 40,000 jobs annually. The majority are absorbed into informal or underproductive work.
This is misalignment between labor supply and productive capacity.
Government revenue depends on the economy it governs.
The IMF’s 2025 Article IV consultation for Malawi notes that the country’s fiscal capacity is constrained by a narrow tax base, including limited value-added tax coverage and the difficulty of capturing revenue from a largely informal economy.
This has direct implications.
If:
then:
This is not only a policy issue. It is a structural one.
Governments absolutely play a central role.
They:
But they do so within the limits of the economic base.
A government cannot sustainably fund large-scale infrastructure from an economy that is not generating sufficient taxable value.
This does not remove responsibility. It clarifies the constraint within which responsibility operates.
At the center of this system is the workforce.
Economic transformation occurs when a workforce:
This is what expands the economic base.
Without it:
The macroeconomy cannot expand independently of the microeconomy.
The interaction between economic structure and political behavior creates a reinforcing loop.
This loop is not theoretical. It is visible.
The vote for maize sits inside this loop.
The question that follows is practical:
What can we as individuals do within this system?
The answer is not abstract.
Individuals influence the economy through:
When these decisions shift toward:
the economic base expands.
This expansion:
Over time, it changes both economic and political outcomes.
The vote for maize is not the problem. It is an outcome of a failing [failed] system.
It reflects:
If the underlying structure changes—if production expands, if incomes stabilize, if food security is less fragile—the nature of decision-making changes with it.
Voters begin to prioritize:
Not because they are told to, but because their conditions allow it.
The conversation about development often begins at the level of government.
It focuses on:
But it cannot end there. It must not.
Because the capacity of any government is tied to the economy it manages.
And the economy, at its core, is built through production.
Governments manage what economies produce.
If the productive base is narrow, the system remains constrained.
If the productive base expands, the system follows.
That is where the work begins.
If you’d like to go deeper into my journey — from Malawi, through the United Nations to Microsoft, you can find it in my books.
P.S. for 2026, you can get any of my books via Kindle for only $2.99.
This offer is valid till the end of the year.
Links to purchase are as below: